Strict Standards: Non-static method phpbb_captcha_factory::get_instance() should not be called statically in /nfs/c05/h01/mnt/83021/domains/edawn-mod.org/html/forum/posting.php on line 185

Strict Standards: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method phpbb_captcha_qa::get_instance() should not be called statically in /nfs/c05/h01/mnt/83021/domains/edawn-mod.org/html/forum/includes/captcha/captcha_factory.php on line 38
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4586: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /posting.php:185)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4588: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /posting.php:185)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4589: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /posting.php:185)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4590: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /posting.php:185)
excessive dawn • Post a reply

I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Re: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by Cyrax » 2016-03-14 19:43:02

OrbitaL-S2D wrote:So what is your compiling environment? what do you use for IDE? just curious
Primary - VS 2005 SP1, mcedit in linux 8-)

Re: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by OrbitaL-S2D » 2016-03-12 01:40:40

So what is your compiling environment? what do you use for IDE? just curious

Re: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by Cyrax » 2016-03-11 13:32:41

OrbitaL-S2D wrote:So it's similar to cpma cnq3?

IIRC cnq3 abandoned long time ago, here is my own change list, copy-paste from ESR:
- native 64-bit support (x86 windows/linux)
- unlagged (raw) mouse input with overflow protection
- additional bind keys (windows,scrollock etc), ability to press all keys [excl.Esc] during demo playback
- in_minimize hotkey (easy hide/restore, win-only)
- keyboard behavior equal for windows and linux clients
- fast downloads via smb(windows share)-redirection for lazy people :) -> \dlmap & \download commands
- smart server restart technique for long non-stop game series
- GTV-compatibility switch (sv_levelTimeReset)
- improved gfx smoothness, hardened qvm filesystem layer
- some additional speed optimizations and bugfixes
- ALSA support

+ http://www.edawn-mod.org/binaries/quake3e-changes.txt
OrbitaL-S2D wrote:What about openal?
Same as with SDL :roll:

Re: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by OrbitaL-S2D » 2016-03-09 10:51:42

So it's similar to cpma cnq3? What about openal?

Re: I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by Cyrax » 2016-03-09 09:23:40

Its based on last non-SDL ioquake3 source tree
Because SDL introduced some keyboard regressions, also it reduces native window control in favor of portability (I don't think that anyone will play this game outside of PC/Windows-Linux market)
At the same time, using cURL is a really good idea because it separates time-critical game trafic and download traffic
Why couldn't they just keep it simple..

Many opinions

I'm interested in 1.32e source

Post by OrbitaL-S2D » 2016-02-24 04:44:06

What is the history of the source?

I'm curious because I would like to start a project and ioq3 has become very bloated... I like sdl and curl but whatever they have added recently has made it bloated for lack of a better word.

Why couldn't they just keep it simple..

Thanks

Top